From 7c3a9d85473b27fa9e65fd60cbb19bafdc203450 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Kirsch Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 05:00:24 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Add Was 2025 an Incredible Year? --- Was-2025-an-Incredible-Year%3F.md | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Was-2025-an-Incredible-Year%3F.md diff --git a/Was-2025-an-Incredible-Year%3F.md b/Was-2025-an-Incredible-Year%3F.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5c1a423 --- /dev/null +++ b/Was-2025-an-Incredible-Year%3F.md @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +
It's Jalopnik's Better of 2021, all of the posts you liked the most. Was 2021 an awesome 12 months? Not precisely! But we did have some posts that received a number of attention. A lady in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, watched State Police place a tracking device on her automobile final weekend and [iTagPro Device](https://bongs.wiki/index.php/User:MackWol8603925) contacted her native NAACP president, who was frankly unimpressed by the agency's spycraft. Tiara Beverly had been arrested in April on serious drug expenses, according to WBRZ. On Wednesday, she mentioned five law enforcement officers who identified themselves as state troopers showed up at her door asking about a person she knew. That person wasn't there, but she said she filed an inside affairs complaint towards the troopers over the way they dealt with her that evening. Two days later, she stated she saw some men in her gated condominium complicated hovering round her automobile. At some point later, she stated she seen the tracking device.
+ +
Not exactly trusting the police at this point, Beverly turned to the Baton Rouge chapter of the NAACP. Eugene Collins, president of the Baton Rouge NAACP, informed reporters the police refused to reply any questions about why they had fastened the tracking [iTagPro Device](https://wikiprofile.ru/index.php?title=ITagPro_Official_-_A_Comprehensive_Overview) to Beverly's automobile, however demanded the machine be returned to them on Monday. The NAACP chapter president was not impressed by the police. WBRZ discovered the gadget mounted to a pole outdoors across the street from McKinley Middle School. You'd suppose the cops would have found it first if it was such an efficient monitoring software. Upon speaking with our detectives, that is part of an ongoing investigation involving Ms. Beverly and a suspect with federal warrants. As part of the investigative process, a warrant was obtained for the surveillance tools. Five officers displaying up at your own home merely to ask about somebody you realize appears fairly excessive, and putting such a device on someone's automotive seems to add much more intimidation to the scenario.
+ +
The Supreme Court dominated in 2012 that police can not use such gadgets and not using a warrant. But is removing such a gadget thought-about theft? In a similar case involving a man named Derek Heuring in Indiana, the state supreme court docket ruled it was not. Heuring was suspected of dealing meth, and police used a tracking device on his automobile. After six days, the system stopped transmitting. The police got a warrant, primarily based on the assumption that Heuring stole the device that he did not know what on his car or where it came from. The police had no more than a hunch that Heuring had eliminated the device, the courtroom said, and that wasn't sufficient to get a search warrant. Even when the police might have proved that Heuring had eliminated the gadget, that wouldn't prove he stole it, the high court docket mentioned. It's exhausting to "steal" something in case you do not know to whom it belongs. \ No newline at end of file